Which educational approach challenges the banking model and emphasizes dialogic, transformative learning to promote social justice?

Which educational approach challenges the banking model and emphasizes dialogic, transformative learning to promote social justice?

• A. Perennialism emphasizes timeless truths.
• B. Progressivism emphasizes learner-centered inquiry.
• C. Critical Pedagogy analyzes power and oppression and promotes dialogic, transformative learning for social justice.
• D. Humanism emphasizes autonomous growth.

Answer: (C)

The focus is on transforming how learning happens by replacing passive receipt of information with dialogic, action-oriented inquiry that aims to change society. This approach scrutinizes power dynamics in education and in the wider world, inviting students and teachers to question who benefits from existing structures and to work together toward justice. This perspective—often called critical pedagogy—asks students to analyze oppression, voice marginalized perspectives, and engage in praxis, the thoughtful combination of reflection and action. By using dialogue rather than one-way depositing of facts, learners develop critical consciousness about social inequities and then apply that understanding to real-world change. It treats education as a political and social project, not just personal knowledge accumulation, and it sees learning as something that should liberate people to transform their communities. Other approaches tend to center on different aims: perennialism emphasizes universal truths and teacher-led transmission; progressivism highlights learner-curated inquiry but not necessarily the critical power analysis tied to justice; humanism focuses on personal growth and autonomy without an explicit emphasis on systemic change.

The focus is on transforming how learning happens by replacing passive receipt of information with dialogic, action-oriented inquiry that aims to change society. This approach scrutinizes power dynamics in education and in the wider world, inviting students and teachers to question who benefits from existing structures and to work together toward justice.

This perspective—often called critical pedagogy—asks students to analyze oppression, voice marginalized perspectives, and engage in praxis, the thoughtful combination of reflection and action. By using dialogue rather than one-way depositing of facts, learners develop critical consciousness about social inequities and then apply that understanding to real-world change. It treats education as a political and social project, not just personal knowledge accumulation, and it sees learning as something that should liberate people to transform their communities.

Other approaches tend to center on different aims: perennialism emphasizes universal truths and teacher-led transmission; progressivism highlights learner-curated inquiry but not necessarily the critical power analysis tied to justice; humanism focuses on personal growth and autonomy without an explicit emphasis on systemic change.